Computer-y things...

Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:14 pm
byslantedlight: (Doyle FallenAngelFaceClose (EmptyMirrors)
[personal profile] byslantedlight
So... is anyone else's lj doing odd things when they post, or is it just me? It's nothing dire, but it's bugging me - when I get so that the posting window has to scroll down, if I go up to change anything somewhere else the whole thing sort of jumps, and the cursor is flicked down to the end of the page so that I have to find my place again, and... just argh! Is that lj, or is it my lappie, for some reason? Although I think it happened on Work Computer too, which would suggest lj...

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 01:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jack-regan.livejournal.com
The jumping and delay is from the traffic being routed to the 3rd party. Yes when you click the link you are actually sent somewhere else. Then the 3rd party has to assess whether the link can have the new code attached, adds it or not, then sends you to where you thought you were going in the first place.

The console thing is ljs console (which they keep mightily hidden) but when you are logged in it's for your account. You can't screw up anything unless you randomly start tying stuff in, and then most like it will return a fail condition, meaning nothing has changed.

There's still some debate as to whether this fix applies only to the browser you've done it in though.

And there has been outrage on this twice, yet they continue to do it.

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
Ah, but I'm not clicking any links - unless you mean the "Post" link... I'm talking about when I'm actually writing a post, I'm literally moving the cursor around the posting window to edit bits and pieces, and the lines are jumping around then. So it's not to do with any visible links - it's not me using links...

Maybe we're talking about different things?

And yeah, but there's outrage and then there's actual usability issues... to be honest the most minor things are so You-Bad-Lj-ed over these days that if I was lj I'd ignore most whinging too... But when it's difficult to use lj in ways that are visible to all of us idiots rather than just the techno-people, then those things will have to be fixed. It might not fix the underlying issue of sending the advert info etc, but the actual clicking and screen-jumping are a different... angle, if you like...

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jack-regan.livejournal.com
It's the same thing, think about how many times the database is getting hit.

Or think about it like this, you know when you have too many application open on your computer and everything starts slowing down because there isn't enough capacity to do all of it at once? That's whats beginning to happen. There's the ads that you may or may not be blocking. The blocking takes a hitch. because the ads still load, the browser just stops them from showing. Then there's the flash that loads in the ads that you have to stop etc. Then there's the link finagling that no one's even really sure precisely what's happening, and then there's the who knows what hasn't been caught yet doing it's thing. All of this leads to performance drops.

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
But all that is stuff that would be happening whenever I have lj open at all, is what you're saying, because it's all going on in the background. But something new has caused these two very specific things to happen, that didn't before even when the adlink thing was on. All I'm doing is moving around the posting window - so is it when I click the cursor to put it in a particular place that's causing something to happen, or...?

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jack-regan.livejournal.com
It's all related. All this is going on in the background for how many thousands of users for how many thousands of links and ads, all the time. And the numbers of ads grows, as does the amount of flash in them, which drains resource, even if you don't see them.

And if this particular thing just cropped up, it probably means they've plopped in something else no one has found yet that is interfering with posting functionality.

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
Oh, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's all related, I just want to know the specifics rather than the eternal Lj-Is-Evil Waah... There are definitely aspects of lj that I'm not keen on, and this adlink thing is one of them - but I guess I'm cynical enough to think that almost everyone, and especially people who've gone financial with something that started out freely and gorgeously, are at least a bit evil. They've been sucked by money to start with - of course they're gonna keep trying to get away with stuff. Look at zine publishers who include the cost of their con attendance in zine prices... (*g*)

Thing is, people get away with it as long as it doesn't affect the way most people are using something - that's why I think this latest issue will be taken care of somehow - cos if I've noticed it, then the odds are most other people have too...

What bugs me is that the specifics that are really an issue will be clouded over by the Lj-Is-Evil issues, which are more... philosophical in nature... Okay, evil, evil, evil, but unless the people shouting this are screening all their food and other consumables for evil, then... we all pick our battles, I guess...

Date: Thursday, 29 April 2010 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jack-regan.livejournal.com
whuh?

This has nothing to do with "evil", it has to do with practices affecting user performance and associated user info security risks.

I'm not sure how much more specific I can get as I do not know their inner setup or pay attention much to what they do now.

But expect continued performance hits as more is added on their end.


Hold Your Breath, Sunshine


A ship is safe in the harbour - but that's not what ships are for.

~o~

I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night. (Sarah Williams)

~o~

Could've.
Should've.
Would've.
Didn't. Didn't. Didn't.

~o~

QqVKBa.jpg
Page generated Saturday, 21 June 2025 01:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios