Pros Everyday for a Week - Day 4/7 - Missing scenes...
Sunday, 24 January 2016 12:33 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It has been a long time since I missed commenting on lj for a day, and then had to scroll back three whole lj pages (of twenty posts each!) to catch up! How bloody brilliant is everyone just now? *vbg* Thank you and thank you and thank you for all your gorgeously Pros-y posts!
My post today is prompted by pics I seem to have seen a few times recently, from Need to Know - you know the one, where Cowley's giving Bodie oxygen after gassing his top team, and strokes his face?
ali15son posted a nice version today too. And it got me thinking about the pics that people don't post - all part of the same scene in the ep, but somehow a missing scene as far as pics being posted anywhere go!
The ones where Cowley helps Doyle as well!
And when Doyle pushes away the oxygen, Cowley gently strokes his chin with a finger, and then he lays a comforting hand on his neck, holds him for a moment... *g*

Cowley looks after both his lads, and although it's a bit difficult to reconcile these tender moments from him with the way he later shoots Manton cold-bloodedly in the back because he's "no use" to them, it's nice to see that he's got a softer side for our Bodie and Doyle... *g*
My post today is prompted by pics I seem to have seen a few times recently, from Need to Know - you know the one, where Cowley's giving Bodie oxygen after gassing his top team, and strokes his face?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The ones where Cowley helps Doyle as well!

And when Doyle pushes away the oxygen, Cowley gently strokes his chin with a finger, and then he lays a comforting hand on his neck, holds him for a moment... *g*


no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 02:29 am (UTC)Yeah, I've always wonder why they never pondered what he would do to them if they should be no use
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 08:15 am (UTC)The enduring impression I have of Ray Doyle from this scene is how adorable he looks trying to stand up. Bless! *g*
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 27 January 2016 04:57 pm (UTC)(including about the adorable-ness of Ray trying to stand up 😆)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 27 January 2016 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 01:24 pm (UTC)So it is wonderful to see some Doyle/Cowley pictures. Thank you!
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 03:19 pm (UTC)It's been great seeing all these Pros photos/stories/references/etc. on my f'list! Thanks for inspiring it!
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 03:52 pm (UTC)I've said it before and I'll say it again - I would never make an lj post that was pointed at someone else on the internet. If I want to complain about you, I'll do it to your face. If I don't like your posts, I'll de-friend you so that I don't see them. I'm afraid I'm pretty straight up about that sort of thing.
I know there are alot of people who aren't honest about things on the internet/on lj/even in Pros (and I've been the subject of some of them myself, such as the person who trolled me to a nasty forum to try and get complete strangers to pile into my lj and have a go at me), but I would never do anything like that. I haven't got any right to complain about what other people choose to post in their own ljs (presuming that it's not hateful or cruel), and no one has a right to complain about what I post. That's just how it works.
So - short answer: no my post wasn't about you, except for the compliment about your pic. I know you worry about that sort of thing, but you really don't need to worry about it from me - I can't stand people being intolerant and/or unkind to each other. When I talk about things, I'm just talking about them.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 04:14 pm (UTC)It holds for both of us though - we're both free to post what we choose to our ljs, and if I want to post about what I see as a general gap in Pros on lj, then that should be okay too - especially when my post actually said something nice about you, rather than complained about you! I don't like to feel attacked either, and this does a bit, now.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 06:04 pm (UTC)i do want to remain friends but i understand if you don't . i willl delete my comments and let you get on with your challenge. I hope you get plenty of pleasure out of the remaing posts that will be heading your way over the next few days
I feel like you're picking a fight now, when there's just no fight to be had. Deleting comments and saying you're not going to play in the challenge any more doesn't resolve anything. You want to interpret my post as being pointed at you. It's not. I've tried to explain that. You (again in your words) "beg to differ". Okay that's fine, but that doesn't resolve anything, because you won't accept what I say, you're continuing to claim my post was pointed at you, and despite deleting your comments you've come back to pick up the "matter" again!
Help me out here - what's really the matter? Maybe we can actually resolve it. If you don't want to though, then please do drop it, because I don't enjoy having people try to fight with me! My Sunday's already been somewhat headache-y and stressful, and was just turning into something nicer when this cropped up.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 January 2016 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 27 January 2016 04:50 pm (UTC)Yes, I agree. I find it difficult to reconcile Cowley's most humane side (not just towards our lads, but also other agents, esp when they are in danger, and the sense of responsibility he feels towards them when they're injured or killed in action... see how genuinely upset and guilty he felt after Tony Miller was killed in Everest), with his ruthless side, especially in his gratuitous (IMO) killing of Manton in this episode, with the justification that he'd been responsible for the death of other agents... Well, since when is Cowley judge & jury? And from someone who'd made a big stink in In the Public Interest about those in charge exerting "unbridled power", and the like. If Manton was indeed suspected of getting people killed, shouldn't he have been put on trial/court martialled etc. and left to courts to decide? It's clear Cowley didn't just want him to stop fleeing (otherwise he'd have shot him in the legs), but intended to kill him. And that left a very sour taste in my mouth, exactly because I'd never expect that from a man who is shrewd enough but had seemed to abide by the rule of law. It makes me think his judgement might have been clouded in Manton's case because Manton's betrayal had had a direct effect on him personally, endangered his reputation and loyalty to Queen & Country; in other words, a sort of personal vendetta taking over a more legitimate way of dealing with traitors like Manton.
I also thought for a while Cowley's un-Cowleylike behaviour at the end of Need to Know could simply be the effect of poor scriptwriting/editing, considering Pros eps were written by very different writers during the series' run, and some odd/inconsistent bit of characterisation was bound to happen that way. But this ep was scripted by B. Clemens himself (though based on an idea by someone else) and I'd always considered his episodes among the best in the series for plot execution and scrip. So I was kind of surprised he'd had Cowley behave that way at the end...
But, on the plus side, I'll still watch it again and again, if anything for the glorious scenes with the lads (being gassed/revived, dressed as coppers, arresting the boss, and the marvellous double act at Bodie's flat with the tulip etc 😊).
Thank you